Anianka a écrit:chat GPT a un programme gramatical de francais, et donc sait que le "elle" fait référence a un mot féminin précédent, et que dans la prhase, il y'a 2 mots féminins qui le précédent, donc qu'il ne peut pas déterminer lequel des deux
je vois pas en quoi il a inventé quoi que ce soit.
Ca tombe bien, seul mon premier exemple, avec la chanson, parlait d'invention.
Anianka a écrit:il doit meme pouvoir déterminer que statistiquement, le mot table est plus souvent assiocié à verre que balle donc je suppose que chat gpt doit favoriser la réponse ou c'est la table qui est cassé
mais ca reste betement statistique.
J'ai bien peur que non... lis l'échange que j'ai eu avec ChatGPT, et trouve les statistiques là dedans...
Il n'est pas possible d'écrire les réponses ci-dessous si on n'a pas de compréhension du sens des mots au-delà de leurs proximités statistiques:
User
if i told you the sentence "the ball broke the table because it was made of glass", can you tell me what is made of glass... the ball or the table
ChatGPT
Based on the sentence "the ball broke the table because it was made of glass," it is clear that the material made of glass refers to the table, not the ball. The sentence implies that the table was fragile due to being made of glass, and therefore broke when the ball collided with it.
User
why could it not be the ball, made of glass ?
ChatGPT
It's certainly possible that the ball in question could have been made of glass, but based on the sentence "the ball broke the table because it was made of glass," it is more likely that the table was made of glass. Here's why:
The sentence "the ball broke the table because it was made of glass" suggests that the glass material was the reason why the table broke. This implies that the table was fragile, and that the ball was the cause of its breakage. If the ball were made of glass, it would also be fragile, and it would not make sense for the glass material to be the cause of the table's breakage. In other words, if the ball were made of glass, it would have been equally fragile as the table, and it would have been the one to break upon impact with the table, rather than the other way around.
Therefore, based on the context and logic of the sentence, it is more likely that the table, rather than the ball, was made of glass.